All Art is, is less linear/more conceptual communication. Therefore, everyone is an artist - or should be.
Museums are just libraries for conceptual utterances that someone considered especially clever, or interesting. (And libraries are museums for linear utterances.)
Museums are just libraries for conceptual utterances that someone considered especially clever, or interesting. (And libraries are museums for linear utterances.)
From:
no subject
I might also point out that if it weren't useful or relevant on some level to distinguish art from other categories of expression, then we would never have developed the concept of art.
Sometimes I am compelled to play Devil's Advocate.
From:
no subject
Just because we couldn't translate the communique's concept back into 'linear' doesn't mean there wasn't one there.
From:
no subject
What do you mean by self-contained, by the way? It sounds like you mean art that doesn't seem to be 'about' anything, that doesn't say anything to you, that just exists in its own little world. A cynical part of me says that an artist who fails to reach the audience, who fails to communicate the idea or the emotion, has failed in the work of art... but then, it's certainly possible for the audience to be closed-minded or unimaginative. I guess both sides have to cooperate-- the audience has to be receptive, and the artist has to have the skill to communicate.